<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Fast Company really understand the Internet?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thomascrampton.com/media/does-fast-company-really-understand-the-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thomascrampton.com/media/does-fast-company-really-understand-the-internet/</link>
	<description>Social Media in China and across Asia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:20:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haris</title>
		<link>http://www.thomascrampton.com/media/does-fast-company-really-understand-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1791</link>
		<dc:creator>Haris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomascrampton.com/2008/02/17/does-fast-company-really-understand-the-internet/#comment-1791</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s crazy how they said Facebook almost ruined their marriage. It is funny how mainstream media don&#039;t fully utilize the power of the internet. Even &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.characterplanet.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mmorpg&lt;/A&gt; game companies are starting to market their products with beta vids/trailers on the web...it&#039;s growing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s crazy how they said Facebook almost ruined their marriage. It is funny how mainstream media don&#8217;t fully utilize the power of the internet. Even <a HREF="http://www.characterplanet.com" rel="nofollow">mmorpg</a> game companies are starting to market their products with beta vids/trailers on the web&#8230;it&#8217;s growing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomascrampton</title>
		<link>http://www.thomascrampton.com/media/does-fast-company-really-understand-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1374</link>
		<dc:creator>thomascrampton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 03:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomascrampton.com/2008/02/17/does-fast-company-really-understand-the-internet/#comment-1374</guid>
		<description>Lynne,

Thanks for updating the comment and including the link.

Valentine&#039;s Day is a fully valid explanation for the oversight!

As for the upstart reference, that is not related to your publication&#039;s age, but the way in which you challenge orthodoxy.

In that light, I am very interested to see how the integration of community goes with your recently revamped your site.

Good luck,

Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lynne,</p>
<p>Thanks for updating the comment and including the link.</p>
<p>Valentine&#8217;s Day is a fully valid explanation for the oversight!</p>
<p>As for the upstart reference, that is not related to your publication&#8217;s age, but the way in which you challenge orthodoxy.</p>
<p>In that light, I am very interested to see how the integration of community goes with your recently revamped your site.</p>
<p>Good luck,</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynne d Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.thomascrampton.com/media/does-fast-company-really-understand-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1356</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynne d Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomascrampton.com/2008/02/17/does-fast-company-really-understand-the-internet/#comment-1356</guid>
		<description>Thomas, for one, FastCompany.com is not an upstart. The magazine has been around nearly 10 years, and the website even longer, though we&#039;ve recently had an upgrade to our site.

As for linking back, that was totally an oversight on our editorial part. The writer had not supplied the link and we were under pressure to get the story up by Valentines Day, and thus that&#039;s probably how we missed it. Not excusable at all. But we were also in the midst of getting this public beta out while still managing our traditional journalism functions.

With that said, trust me, we get it. You brought it to our attention and it will be corrected.

Thanks for paying attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas, for one, FastCompany.com is not an upstart. The magazine has been around nearly 10 years, and the website even longer, though we&#8217;ve recently had an upgrade to our site.</p>
<p>As for linking back, that was totally an oversight on our editorial part. The writer had not supplied the link and we were under pressure to get the story up by Valentines Day, and thus that&#8217;s probably how we missed it. Not excusable at all. But we were also in the midst of getting this public beta out while still managing our traditional journalism functions.</p>
<p>With that said, trust me, we get it. You brought it to our attention and it will be corrected.</p>
<p>Thanks for paying attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

