It is not surprising that mainstream and established media companies don’t understand the Internet, but apparently high profile upstart Fast Company doesn’t either.
Let me explain:
The magazine/website Fast Company just wrote about an incident in which Facebook almost ended my marriage.
The story, picked up from my blog posting on the incident, has been written about by a number of blogs and publications.
The blogs, Boing Boing and Justin Fox at Time magazine, both linked back to the posting when they wrote about it.
The London Evening Standard and the French newspaper Liberation, however, did not link to the posting when they mentioned it in articles.
You’d think that things would be different at Fast Company, but apparently not.
Linkbacks serve the interests of readers in giving transparency for the source of information, so why don’t publications do it? Martin Varsavsky wrote a thoughtful piece on the issue here.
UPDATE: Businessweek apparently hates the web even more than Fast Company! Don MacAskill of Smugmug has a great posting about how Businessweek actually blocked him from deeplinking to an article written about him. How do they expect to get readers if they don’t allow recommendations? (Thanks to Yusuf for highlighting this!)
UPDATE: Fast Company just updated the article to include a link. Lynne Johnson of Fast Company said (in comment below) that the oversight came due to a rush to close the magazine for Valentine’s Day. Romance is always a valid explanation!
Technorati Tags: Fast Company, martin varsavsky
Popularity: 4% [?]
Discussion
Comments are disallowed for this post.